Environmental impact in low-income housing: Sustainability strategies for impact reduction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/la2025242

Keywords:

Social housing, sustainability, environmental impact, recycled materials, energy efficiency

Abstract

The research analyzed the environmental impact of Social Interest Housing (VIS) in the Carlos Pizarro neighborhood of Pasto. The study was based on the architectural survey of a typical house, in which the masses of the materials used were calculated and evaluated using Eco-Indicator 99. The results showed that materials such as steel, brick and acrylic paint generated the greatest environmental load, with a total impact estimated at 3,109,076 millipoints. Based on this diagnosis, two improvement proposals were formulated. The first consisted of replacing the internal walls with light structures of wood, fiberglass and gypsum panels. However, the reduction achieved was only 0.6%, which showed that partial interventions had a limited effect. The second proposal proposed a comprehensive transformation through the use of sustainable and recycled materials, such as PVC, polyaluminum and Tetrapak tiles. This redesign allowed a 92% reduction in the initial environmental impact, demonstrating that sustainable construction strategies were effective only when applied from the beginning of the construction process. Additionally, the incorporation of photovoltaic and rainwater harvesting systems was evaluated. The solar panels guaranteed the energy supply of the houses, even with the possibility of injecting surpluses into the grid. The rainwater collection system made it possible to replace up to 71.6% of the monthly potable water consumption, mitigating the pressure on this resource. In conclusion, the study demonstrated that sustainability in VIS was achievable through a comprehensive redesign, the selection of low-impact materials and the implementation of energy and water efficiency technologies.

References

1. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica. (2010). Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sismo Resistente NSR-10 (Tomo 2). Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica.

2. Avendaño, A. (2020). Introducción a la construcción sostenible. Consejo Colombiano de Construcción Sostenible. https://www.cccs.org.co/wp/mitigacion/guia-introduccion-a-la-construccion-sostenible/

3. Buss, A. (2021). ¿Cómo afrontar el impacto ambiental desde el sector de la construcción? Camacol Valle. https://revistandc.camacolvalle.org.co/impacto-ambiental-el-sector-constructor/

4. Caterpillar Inc. (2000). Manual de rendimiento (31.ª ed., p. 947, Serie SSBD0341). Caterpillar Inc. https://es.slideshare.net/slideshow/manual-rendimiento-maquinaria-pesada-caterpillar/32754253

5. Ecoembes. (2023). Los efectos en el medioambiente de la electricidad. https://reducereutilizarecicla.org/medioambiente-electricidad/

6. Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212

7. Goedkoop, M., Effting, S., & Collignon, M. (1999). Eco-indicador 99: Método para evaluar el impacto ambiental a lo largo del ciclo de vida. PRé Consultants B.V. & IHOBE. https://proyectaryproducir.com.ar/public_html/Seminarios_Posgrado/Herramientas/Eco%20indicador%2099%20ca.pdf

8. Landaeta, A. M., Ospina, A., Lizcano, J. D., Arroyave, N., Jiménez, M. A., Ferro, M., Carreño, T., & Zuluaga, V. (2024). Estado de la construcción sostenible en Colombia. https://www.cccs.org.co/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Estado_de_la_Construccion_Sostenible_2024pdf.pdf

9. Ministerio de Vivienda, Ciudad y Territorio de Colombia. (2017). Vivienda de interés social – SGR. Colombia potencia de vida. https://minvivienda.gov.co/ministerio/planeacion-gestion-y-control/sistema-general-de-regalias/lineamientos-para-presentacion-de-proyectos/vivienda-de-interes-social-sgr

10. Tiktin, J. (1997). Determinación de la producción de una máquina y costes (3ª ed., pp. 42–43). EPSA Internacional, S.A. / E.T.S. Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Servicio de Publicaciones.

11. Zapeter, C. (2017). Determinación del rendimiento de una retroexcavadora marca Caterpillar 420E de 94hp para el movimiento de tierras [Trabajo de titulación, Universidad Técnica de Machala]. Repositorio Digital. https://repositorio.utmachala.edu.ec/bitstream/48000/11008/1/TUAIC_2017_IC_CD0065.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

1.
Cabrera Pantoja NV. Environmental impact in low-income housing: Sustainability strategies for impact reduction. Land and Architecture [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 26 [cited 2025 Sep. 1];4:242. Available from: https://la.ageditor.ar/index.php/la/article/view/242