Redefining Urban Spaces with Natural Elements: Biophilic Architecture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/la2024105

Keywords:

Urban spaces, Natural elements, Biophilic architecture

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the article is to examine how to connect people with nature through biophilic architecture, based on the idea that proximity to nature can improve health and well-being, promoting a balance between urban and natural environments. It also seeks to analyze the physical and emotional benefits that these spaces can provide to those who inhabit them.

Methodology: An exhaustive narrative review of the existing scientific literature was carried out. Databases such as Scopus, Scielo and Scispace were consulted using terms related to “architecture”, “design”, “biophilic” and “emotional”. The search period covered publications from 2020 to 2024, and less empirical manuscripts such as letters to the editor or theses were excluded.

Results: The review identified a total of 86 articles initially, of which 10 were selected that addressed biophilic architecture and its impact on well-being. The results suggest that biophilic architecture can improve cognitive function, reduce stress, and create a calmer environment in built spaces. It also underscores the importance of opportunities to experience nature within urban environments.

Main Conclusions: The article's conclusions highlight that biophilic architecture is an innovative approach to integrating nature into architectural design, improving human well-being and fostering a deeper connection with the natural environment. The implementation of natural elements in built spaces not only improves occupant comfort and health, but also promotes sustainability and urban biodiversity. Overall, biophilic architecture presents an effective strategy for creating more pleasant and healthy environments for living and working.

References

1. Abazari, T., Potvin, A., Demers, C. M., & Gosselin, L. (2022). A biophilic wellbeing framework for positive indoor-outdoor connections in energy-efficient Arctic buildings. Building and Environment, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109773

2. Asim, F., Rai, S., & Shree, V. (2021a). Biophilic architecture for restoration and therapy within the built environment. Visions for Sustainability, 2021(15), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/5104

3. Asim, F., Rai, S., & Shree, V. (2021b). Biophilic architecture for restoration and therapy within the built environment. Visions for Sustainability, 2021(15), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/5104

4. Atthakorn, S. (2022). Passive and Biophilic Design: Assessment of the Semi-Open Educational Atrium Buildings in the Tropics. Nakhara: Journal of Environmental Design and Planning, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.54028/NJ202221203

5. Cárcamo Vásquez, H. (2005). Hermenéutica y Análisis Cualitativo. Cinta Moebio, 23, 204–216.

6. Colding, J., Gren, Å., & Barthel, S. (2020). The incremental demise of urban green spaces. Land, 9(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9050162

7. Escamilla-Cerón, K., & Luna-Rodríguez, S. A. (2020). BIOPHILIC DESIGN AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE URBAN FURNITURE | EL DISEÑO BIOFÍLICO Y SU RELACIÓN CON EL MOBILIARIO URBANO. Legado de Arquitectura y Diseno, 15(27). https://doi.org/10.36677/legado.v15i27.14039

8. Gabriel, E., Piccilli, D. G. A., Tassi, R., Köhler, M., & Krebs, L. F. (2024). Improving indoor environmental quality in an affordable house by using a vegetated wall: A case study in subtropical Brazil. Building and Environment, 250(December 2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111146

9. Jóźwik, R., & Jóźwik, A. (2022). Influence of environmental factors on urban and architectural design—Example of a former paper mill in nanterre. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010086

10. Muhamad, J., Ismail, A. A., Khair, S. M. A. S. A., & Ahmad, H. (2022). A Study of Daylighting Impact at Inpatient Ward, Seri Manjung Hospital. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 13(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2022.13.02.021

11. Sadanand, A., Chander, S., & Devadas, M. (2022). A Dialogue with Nature Through Biophilic Design: Focus on the Façade Wall in the Architecture of Laurie Baker’s Houses. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 17(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.170105

12. Zhong, W., Schroeder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2023a). Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(4), 732–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001

13. Zhong, W., Schroeder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2023b). Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(4), 732–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2023.03.001.

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Chambi Apaza JJ, Almirón Cuentas JA, Bernedo-Moreira DH. Redefining Urban Spaces with Natural Elements: Biophilic Architecture. Land and Architecture [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Aug. 29];3:105. Available from: https://la.ageditor.ar/index.php/la/article/view/105